Forensic psychiatry, statutory law, and administrative rules.
نویسنده
چکیده
This commentary highlights the importance of statutory law and administrative rules to the practice of forensic psychiatry. Often small changes in laws and rules significantly shape the practice environment of psychiatrists, whether in the hospital setting or in the community. A case example is presented to illustrate how significant changes were made in the treatment refusal procedures in Oregon's state hospitals with very little public notice or participation. This example illustrates the importance of focusing significant forensic psychiatric attention on the actions of state legislatures and the rules promulgated by the executive branch of state governments. The commentary concludes with a discussion that emphasizes the role of forensic psychiatry in helping to maintain a workable practice environment.
منابع مشابه
Toward the development of guidelines for the conduct of forensic psychiatric examinations.
Guidelines for conducting forensic psychiatric consultations and evaluations have not been clearly established. The authors offer and discuss such guidelines, which are based upon the boundary guidelines in general psychiatric practice, ethics principles in general psychiatry, ethics principles in forensic psychiatry, and the relevant case and statutory law. These guidelines are intended to ass...
متن کاملThe consultation model and forensic psychiatric practice.
Seymour Pollack developed three categorizing definitions which provided forensic psychiatry with a logical framework for development as a subspecialty of general psychiatry. The first definition separated the body of information related to the interaction oflaw and psychiatry required by the general psychiatrist from information specific to the subspecialty of forensic psychiatry. The general p...
متن کاملAAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
The insanity defense is a legal construct that excuses certain mentally ill defendants from legal responsibility for criminal behavior. This practice guideline has delineated the forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. The document describes acceptable forensic psychiatric practices. Where possible, standards of practice and ethical guidelines have been speci...
متن کاملThe American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
State legislatures need guidance in implementing the United States Supreme Court's decision in Atkins v. Virginia barring execution of mentally retarded offenders. In this Resource Document, the American Psychiatric Association's Council on Psychiatry and Law, the component charged with developing policies and positions relating to forensic psychiatry, recommends statutory language addressing t...
متن کاملA case of insanity: diagnostic relevance in the shadow of Columbine.
As director of a forensic psychiatry fellowship program, I am sometimes asked how important psychiatric diagnoses are in sanity and competency opinions. Given that the legal, usually statutory, definition of mental disease or defect is the primary concern in criminal forensic opinions and that legal definitions do not reflect descriptive diagnoses, what difference does it make whether someone i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 39 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011